IPad might be the future, but without Flash, it could be alienating the present
Exactly why this device was mis-named. It should have been called, iBook or iZine. Imagine if this were any other company rolling out a device that restricts you not only from using sites that feature Flash but also from multi-tasking. Plus you’re charged a $600+ price tag. Is that really how much you want to pay for an iTunes player with a(limited) web browser?
-
worldofwando reblogged this from winstonwolfe
-
go liked this
-
mathewhoy liked this
-
writer-b reblogged this from soupsoup
-
thedeadline liked this
-
brilliantcrank reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
present. Mr. Milian writes: “As long as you don’t watch Web videos using Flash technology, and that’s about 75% of the...
-
creeperstatus liked this
-
winstonwolfe reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
Exactly why this device was mis-named. It should have been called, iBook or iZine. Imagine if this were any other...
-
shorterexcerpts liked this
-
inothernews liked this
-
hughbot liked this
-
kassiakarr liked this
-
soupsoup posted this
